Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Facebook debates rule

Earlier today I ran across some of the worst anti-choice arguments I've read in a long time. I'm not really going to respond... because these statements speak for themselves. I can argue with an "anti-choicer" that is attempting to engage in rational thought. There can't be much discussion with someone that shows such shockingly poor critical thinking skills.

Enjoy.

Moron#1
1.2 million babies killed in the US last year alone.

To you pro-choicers out there: If there's even the SMALLEST chance that unborn babies might be people, wouldn't you be concerned about 1.2 million of them being killed every year? Over the course of decades, that'd be the biggest genocide in the history of the world, being perpetrated in our country.

Even if it were likely that pro-choicers were right about unborn babies not having rights, wouldn't it still be best not to kill them anyway just in case they did have the same rights as everyone else?



Moron #2

I find it funny that most pro-choicers are also pro-environment, meaning they would rather save the life of a tree than the life of an unborn child. In their eyes that tree possesses more life than a fetus i suppose.


Good point, sir. You just might be right. Color me evil.
sequoia

Now for a real asshole.

In the case of life-threatening complications (for the mother); So in this case, the mother's life is more valuable than the unborn child's? So in your opinion, all people are not created equal?

In the case of rape; The best solution so an already tragic situation is to follow it up with another (i.e. the murder of a human being)?


Die motherfucker.... just die.

fuck you

No comments: